First prototype of the Chengdu J-XX or J-20 Very Low Observable (VLO) fighter aircraft. A large high performance design with excellent stealth shaping, this aircraft is expected to be become the centrepiece of the PLA-AF fighter fleet. It combines the innovative harmonisation of extreme plus agility, supersonic cruise, large range and persistence, and stealth, achieved through the rigorous and disciplined application of Chinese interpretations of western engineering design rules and the advanced manufacturing and production technologies in which China now leads the world (Chinese Internet).
The Chairman of the Central Military Commission of the People’s Republic of China looked at the Committee members, assembled in the August 1st Building, at the dawn of 6 December 2020.
The air was charged with tension and expectation.
“Tomorrow, if you each tell me your plans and Forces are ready, we will immediately end the US hegemony of the Western Pacific. The US, despite our repeated warnings, has continued to arm the rebel Government in Taiwan, the latest shipments being 200 F-35s they had surplus after JSF sales to Europe collapsed. These aircraft are now in action against us, and in the past week, three J-10A ‘Vigorous Dragon’ fighters have been destroyed while on peaceful patrols of the Straights. This behaviour cannot, and will not be tolerated. Now, let me ask about your preparedness – and true and accurate reports only – if there are weaknesses, now is the time to correct them, not in the heat of battle. Commander-in-Chief (CIC), tell us the strategic plan.”
The CIC rises and opens a PowerPoint briefing on a large screen.
“Our military forces will eliminate the larger US bases across the Western Pacific. Each of the Armed Services will have a substantial role on this Joint and highly coordinated operation. The Second Artillery using DF-21 terminally guided IRBMs; the PLA-AF using the new J-20 ‘Black Eagle’ stealth fighters; and, the PLA-N will employ submarine launched cruise missiles, mainly our excellent DH-10 missiles. Our Intelligence Agencies have been collecting targeting information on critical infrastructure for several years. The initial targets will be digital communications and military installations and equipment. If US naval forces come within 1,000 nautical miles of our coast, they will be attacked with terminally guided DF-21D missiles. Each of our designated Fire Bases will be protected by mobile Surface to Air Missile batteries. Any incoming counter-attack will be detected at long range by HF Sky-Wave and Surface-Wave Over-The-Horizon-radars. Preparations will take place in our “super-hardened” underground airbase hangars to avoid observation by US spy satellites. We have other assets prepared. Mr Chairman, here is the Military Tasking Order of Operation Long March’ …”
There is a sharp intake of breath as the PowerPoint slide is flashed onto the screen. The scope and scale of Operation Long March makes the infamous 1941 Pearl Harbour attack look like a mere tactical skirmish.
The members study the PowerPoint table in complete silence. Each of the Service Chiefs’ heads nod in agreement, knowing that the deployment of forces is well within their operational capabilities and the skills of their crews.
“A question – why Guam International?” says the Chairman.
“We know that some military aircraft are parked in the hangars to the north of the airfield, but our main target is the fibre-optic hubs near the airport. When we breach those, much of the digital communication across the Pacific to the US will be terminated. This will force the American military and their allies to have to use very limited bandwidth satellites – and we can knock those down too, if we wish” is the reply from CIC.
“Thank you Commander-in-Chief, a good answer. Minister for Finance?” invites the Chairman. The Minister stands and moves to the Podium. He speaks quietly and confidently, and the members strain to hear him.
“Our finances are ready to weather the disruption this action may bring. Our GDP is now larger than the whole of the American GDP. We have reduced our exposure in US Treasury holdings to less than $US15B – the Americans’ program of printing money has made them virtually worthless as the US dollar continues to decline in value. We have moved our trillions of FOREX USD into the currencies of our trading partners, raising the value of their currency relative to ours so they can afford to buy our goods, and of course making their futures dependent on our holdings. Our gold reserves are over 2,000 tonnes. We plan to sell a large amount when the action starts, while keeping our other precious metal holdings in reserve. We expect the profit will easily offset the cost of Operation Long March. We are in good shape.”
Next, the Chief of the PLA speaks. “Our DF-21 forces are in position. We plan to launch 30 to 60 rounds into each target.”
“Won’t that be expensive?” asks the Minister for Finance?
“No”, replies the Minister for Defence Materiel, “these missiles are nearly time-expired. It costs as much to refurbish them as to build the new and more effective DF-21Ds.”
“Just so” says the PLA Chief, “We have upgraded the guidance system to the ‘C’ model, so they will be very accurate and cost-effective.”
As if an afterthought, he says, “I also have the HQ-9, the S-300PMU2, S-400 and the HQ-20 SAMs in place to protect the launch Firebases and the key cities of the Homeland if the USA decides to launch cruise missiles from bombers or submarines. We will not get them all, but we will get most and protect our cities and people.”
“Air Force?” asks the Chairman.
“We have been receiving one J-20 stealth fighter a week since 2016,” the PLA Chief continues, “We now have 160 J-20A single-seat fighters, and 80 J-20B two-seat theatre-bombers. These are all in fully operational service, so the MTO just fits. You know, the US Secretary of Defence Robert Gates was half right when he said China would not have a ‘Stealth Fighter’ until 2025 – perhaps he was speaking of our mature and full capability. But I digress. With the low signature of the J-20, we can employ our excellent satellite guided glide bombs, and the Minister for Finance might be pleased to hear that our estimate of the ordnance cost for an airfield target will be less than $US4 million. Not a bad economic exchange for the destruction of American military capabilities.”
“And the Navy?” invites the Chairman.
“We have our submarines in place near each target, and they will be in deep water as they fire, so have an excellent chance of escaping,” he advises. “This attack will not destroy these bases, but there will be a lot of damage and loss of capability, especially aircraft the Americans arrogantly park on open tarmacs. I also have underwater assets in place off Los Angeles, and there are several ships carrying containerised Klub cruise missiles off the East and West Coast of the USA, if we need any follow-up action.”
“Thank you all. Now, what of the 200 F-35s on Taiwan?” asks the Chairman.
The Minister for Cyber Defense, Madam Chien-Shiung Wu, has a Berkeley PhD in Computer Science and is young, brilliant and beautiful – in a scintillating pink-diamond sort of way, and speaks with chilling certainty.
“Over the past decade, my staff have penetrated the JSF software facilities and have made ‘certain changes’ that cripple the JSF. This is classified ‘above top secret’ and so you do not need to know more”.
The Air Force Chief asks “Then how were my three J-10A’s destroyed by the Taiwanese F-35s?”
“A piece of deceptive illusion,” replies Madame Wu, “We had to convince the US with a war-like demonstration that their F-35’s systems work, so we ‘arranged’ a successful F-35 attack on the J-10s - when you are network dependent you are cyber-vulnerable. Our pilots were specially briefed and ejected in straight and level flight just before the Taiwanese AIM-120 missiles hit. So the arrogant Americans will think their ‘war-tested’ F-35s are working perfectly.”
“Well, even if they have found this bug,” advises the Army Chief, “we have been using the F-35 operations over Taiwan to check its signatures, and my SAM people say even the obsolete HQ-9s will kill them. I also have the HQ-20s ready.”
“And I have J-10As and Bs and our J-11Bs on alert ready to catch any you don’t get,” says the Air Force Chief with equally chilling confidence.
“Are you all confident that ‘Operation Long March’ will be successful?” asks the Chairman. All heads nod in agreement. “Very well, the attack on Andersen Air Force Base will start at 10:00AM Local Time on 7 December 2020. The submarine and DF-21 attacks will be delayed accordingly, as advised by CIC, to provide the Black Eagles with the advantage of complete surprise.”
The Chief of the Air Force General Yónggàn de Zhànshì rises and asks the Chairman, “My son is the J-20B Wing Commander. I am fully qualified on the J-20B. May I fly into battle as one of my son’s wingmen?”
“General, you may”, agrees the Chairman, “and our good fortune flies with you.”
Andersen AFB at Guam. The absence of modern hardening measures presents a major survivability challenge for this base in any escalated contingency (US Air Force image).
Apra Harbour Naval Complex on Guam (US DoD).
Kadena AFB, Okinawa, home of the 18th Wing. In the background are TAB-V Hardened Aircraft Shelters, which are not designed to survive hits from bunker buster penetrating munitions (US Air Force image).
C-141B Starlifter of the 63rd MAW, Norton AFB, taxiing at Yokota AFB in the outer western Tokyo suburbs, a major logistical hub and HQ site for the 5th Air Force. Yokota AFB is an unhardened air base (© 1984 - 2010 C. Kopp).
CV-41 USS Midway and CV-62 USS Independence berthed at Yokosuka, south of Yokohama, in 1991 (US DoD).
500 kg Luoyang/CASC LS-6 satellite/inertial guided bomb at Zhuhai 2010. The LS-6 series of planar wing glidebombs is modelled on the Australian developed Kerkanya and GBU-31/38 JDAM-ER (Extended Range) wing kits (Zhenguan Studio, © 2010 Air Power Australia).
100 kg Luoyang/CASC LS-6 satellite/inertial/electro-optical guided bomb at Zhuhai 2010. This weapon is a Chinese analogue to the American GBU-39/B and GBU-53/B Small Diameter Bombs, developed for internal carriage by stealth fighters (Zhenguan Studio, © 2010 Air Power Australia).
Luoyang/CASC FT-2 500 kg satellite/inertial guided glide bomb kit (© 2009, Zhenguan Studio).
PLA-AF Shenyang J-8 Finback fighters being towed into one of the PLAs many 'superhardened' underground air bases. Tunnelled horizontally into the sides of hills, these bases are unusually difficult to destroy and permit concealed preparations for operation, as fuelling, weapons loading and runup activity is invisible to orbital and airborne ISR assets (Chinese Internet).
The PLA-AF fighter base at Feidong in the Nanjing MR is a good example of the design of a 'superhardened' fighter base. The primary runway , available for takeoffs and landings, has a wide full length parallel taxiway to enable recoveries in the event of damage. An auxiliary take-off only alert runway is directly connected to the underground hangar entrance, allowing the fighter to roll out of the tunnel, line up, open the throttles and take off without delay. The PLA invested considerable thought into planning its network of 'superhardened' fighter bases, usually placing the runways behind a hill or mountain, relative to the threat axis. Another good example of such a base is at PLANAF Yiwu AB also in the Nanjing MR, which hosts at least seven such bases. While modern smart weapons have diminished the effectiveness of such base designs, they still present genuine challenges in targeting and achieving robust weapons effects (US DoD).
DF-21C TEL during the 2010 parade. DF-21 batteries are dispersed during alerts making pre-emptive targeting unusually difficult to perform.
Chinese sources report the ground launched CJ-10 CJ-10 Long Sword to be the GLCM variant of the DH-10 design, carried on a three round TEL. CJ-10 batteries are dispersed during alerts making pre-emptive targeting unusually difficult to perform (Chinese Internet).
Type 093 or 09-III Shang class SSN of the PLA Navy (Chinese Internet).
At 14:00 on the 6th December 2020, the scene moves to Yiwu Airbase near Shanghai, a former PLANAF super-hardened underground airbase, and now the home of the first J-20B Black Eagle Air Regiment. Colonel Liè Lóng rises to his feet to address his aircrew and battle-staff.
“Warriors, we have been commanded by Air Task Order (ATO) ‘Black Eagle Long March’ to go into battle to liberate the Pacific Ocean from the 75 year tyranny of the United States. Our regiment's task is to eliminate the Guam Air and Naval Bases as viable military installations. We will…..” He is interrupted as each of the men and women rise and begin to cheer – they have been training for this moment for months and years, and have great pride in their expertise and equipment, albeit untested in war.
The Colonel raises his hand for silence, and the tumult quickly dies away. “As I was saying, we will fly to the Guam launch points - 50 nautical miles for J-20As and 20 nautical miles for the J-20Bs - release our ordnance, and return. The Intelligence and Weapons Officers have done their jobs well and each bomb has been programmed with a target area. Some of the 100 kg bombs with EO sensors will search for high value targets; other 500 kg bombs will use GPS-INS to destroy fixed installations. We have three squadrons of twelve J-20As and a squadron of twelve J-20B fighter-bombers for the task, so this will be a near-saturation attack.”
“J-20B pilots, you will each be flying the ‘Deadly Rain’ manoeuvre you have practiced so many times. Make sure you fly with precision and confidence, as your lives will depend on your skill. The J-20As will also be armed as fighter escorts in case any F-22As or F-35As are on combat air patrol duties. Each aircraft has an individual ATO, so study this carefully. Now, get some rest – we take-off at 06:30, there is a refuelling outbound and possibly inbound if you are intercepted. The mission will last about 7 hours. China salutes your strength and courage.”
General Yónggàn de Zhànshì rises at 04:00, dresses and enjoys a hearty traditional breakfast, and attends the final briefing at 05:30. Weather is clear over Guam, as the ‘fanumnangan’ dry season has started – a perfect environment for smart EO bombs looking for an exposed target. At 6:30, he is taxiing as number two in the third element of the second Squadron, and makes an uneventfully smooth takeoff. Captain Gōngjiàn Shou, his Weapon Systems Officer, is nervous flying a combat mission with the Chief, but soon settles into the task.
The Squadrons fly out 1,000 nautical miles, and take it in turns to drink from an H-6U Badger or an Il-78 Midas aerial tanker. Then on another 600 nautical miles to the weapons release point.
Like all such war activities, this long transit is boring straight and level flight. However, each J-20's radio frequency surveillance system is active, continually ‘sniffing’ the ether for hostile radar and radio transmissions. As they approach Guam, the radars and civil aircraft chatter is intercepted and assessed. Each of the J-20 fighters is part of a ‘Low-Probability-of-Intercept’ information net, with data being exchanged by directional, millimetre wave data-link pencil beams. The network has multiple redundancies and each and every aircraft can act as a peer-to-peer node. As a result, the aircraft all share a common air picture, and the crews can communicate with little chance of the transmissions being intercepted.
In the J-20s, a professional calm prevails in each Squadron and Flight as each of the aircraft approaches the GPS release point designated in its ATO. As the J-20Bs approach to 20 nautical miles at 45,000 feet and Mach 1.5, the engines are advanced to full afterburner, and the nose raised to 20 degrees; 0.8G is held.
At the designated release point, the weapons bay doors on each aircraft are opened; the LS-6 100 kg smart bombs are ripple-released at one-per-second. Lastly, a single LD-20 decoy dispenser is launched after rolling a few degrees to the right. Doors are closed, the aircraft barrel-roll into a tight Immelman turn to escape, presenting any missiles launched from Guam with a difficult supersonic tail-chase. Engines are returned to military power to close the nozzles and lower the radar signature.
Meanwhile, the two hundred and forty released 100 kg LS-6 smart bombs fall into the attack “basket”, descending in a graceful curve.
The LD-20 falls 5,000 feet and its three petals open, releasing 49 radar-reflecting decoys, each with aerodynamic drag designed to fall slightly faster than the LS-6 bombs. This, plus the chaff packed throughout the canister, screens the attacking LS-6 bombs and the retreating J-20Bs.
On Guam at 9:56, it is a beautiful clear Monday. The MIM-104 PAC-4 Patriot teams are recovering from a hectic weekend of social activities, and are enjoying the light sea breeze. Their reverie is woken rudely by a blaring klaxon.
Lieutenant Brown is in charge of the battery, he bounds into the Engagement Control Station van.
What he sees first confounds him, and then horrifies him – 48 radar symbols bloom across the screen, then from each symbol a cloud expands with numbers too large to count – all inbound for Guam.
Some symbols are headed directly for Andersen AFB, others for the Guam International Airport, and a third set to the Apra Naval Complex. A gut wrenching comprehension of what is unfolding finally dawns on the Lieutenant.
“This is a stealth attack – and those incomings are probably bombs.” Forty-eight of the symbols disappear as the J-20 weapons bay doors close, and then a faint, rapidly retreating group of blips appears, then wink out one-by-one off the screen.
The larger 500 kg winged LS-6 glide-bombs head for their GPS designated targets: C3 centres, maintenance facilities, munitions storage and the massive underground fuel storage tanks.
The smaller 100 kg LS-6 “small diameter bombs” have a more interesting task. As they approach their GPS designated search box, their Electro-Optical seekers scan the tarmac for targets, selecting high-value planforms like B-2As and F-22As over lesser value targets like F-35s and F/A-18s. They do not make and lock-in their aim-point selection until the final few seconds of flight.
If they don’t find a parked aircraft target, they head for a building.
Some 240 LS-6s are incoming, screened by no less than 588 ballistically, and in radar signature appearance, near-identical decoys.
Lieutenant Brown is not having a good day. He finally orders the battery “weapons free” to engage as many incomings as possible. His Patriot launchers have up to 48 ready shots loaded, but with 240 bombs and 588 decoys incoming, his, and the Patriot systems’ tasks, are impossible. The Patriot missiles scan ahead and each detects and reports a plethora of returns using its ‘Track-Via-Missile’. Which is a bomb and which is a decoy? After all rounds are fired, about 220 LS-6S are inbound, and nothing is left in the Patriot locker to fire.
Two B-2As and twelve F-22As are on a deployment to Andersen AFB. They are just back from the 06:00 ‘sunrise strike’ on Farallon de Medinilla Island bombing range and are being refuelled, repaired and re-armed for the next mission at 12:00. Without hardened shelters, each aircraft is in the open and several of the LS-6s find them in their designated kill box.
The LS-6s arrive nearly simultaneously like a deadly hail from Hell, and the entire tarmac area erupts in a massive series of explosions, enhanced by aircraft fuel, tankers and weapons sympathetically exploding. The ground crew watch, horrified, as the LS-6 smart bombs drop near vertically into the centroid of each aircraft, blasting them to smithereens. Huge fuel fires and weapon detonations erupt.
At Guam International, it is much the same. PLA HUMINT has identified which of the hangars on the north-side of the airfield contain military aircraft, and several are hit by 500 kg LS-6 glide-bombs. More importantly, the communications buildings across Guam housing the trans-pacific fibre-optic cable repeaters are hit with several bombs, and communications are instantly terminated.
The Apra Harbour Naval Complex receives multiple hits from the assigned 72 LS-6 500 kg GPS-INS guided bombs. HUMINT delivered by cellular telephone earlier that morning identifies two nuclear submarines and three frigates alongside piers. Each receives a direct hit by an LS-6. The remaining rounds devastate the support facilities.
Ten minutes later, a pair of J-20R reconnaissance fighters pass over Guam flying from South-East to North-West, with AESA radars and cameras recording the damage. Their job is hampered by massive quantities of burning fuel and aluminium ash in the air, but the AESAs can detect the detail of shapes on the ground. Post-flight assessments confirm that all attack objectives were met.
Several hours later, General Yónggàn de Zhànshì is enjoying the euphoria with the aircrew and support staff in the Black Eagle Operations Room. “I cannot, for security reasons, tell you more, but China is very proud of you, and those who designed and delivered the Black Eagle capability.”
He then returns to his J-20B and with Captain Gōngjiàn Shou, flies to Beijing International, where the J-20B stealth fighter will be put on public display. From there, he is whisked away by a staff car to the Central Military Commission.
The Chairman of the Central Military Commission addresses the assembled members. “Well done to each of you and the Services you represent. In Operation ‘Long March’ the time from first J-20 weapons-bay door opening to the last DF-21 and DF-10 impact was less than 15 minutes. Twenty strategic targets were attacked and severely damaged across 6 million square miles of ocean, and we had no losses. Assessments are still being conducted, but it seems all strategic objectives have been achieved. We must now be on our guard for a counter-attack. We are ready. Thank you all.”
i Kopp C., The Strategic Impact of China's J-XX [J-20] Stealth Fighter, Air Power Australia NOTAM #70, 9th January, 2011, URI: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-NOTAM-090111-1.html.
ii Kopp C. and Goon P.A., Chengdu J-XX [J-20] Stealth Fighter Prototype; A Preliminary Assessment, Technical Report APA-TR-2011-0101, January 2011, URI: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-J-XX-Prototype.html.
iii Stillion J., Orletsky D.T., Airbase Vulnerability to Conventional Cruise-Missile and Ballistic-Missile Attacks;Technology, Scenarios, and U.S. Air Force Responses, Monograph MR-1028, Project Air Force, RAND Corporation, URI: http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1028.html.
iv Stillion J., Fighting Under Missile Attack, Air Force Magazine, Vol. 92, No. 8, August, 2009, URI:http://www.airforce-magazine.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2009/August%202009/0809fighting.aspx
v Kopp C., EXPANDING THE ENVELOPE - Stealth and Other Strike Roles, Air & Space Power Chronicles, Maxwell AFB, July 2000, URI: http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/cc/kopp.html.
vi Kopp C., Maritime Strike Using The F-22A Raptor, Technical Report APA-TR-2007-0401, April, 2007, URI:http://www.ausairpower.net/Raptor-ASuW.html.
vii Bolkcom C., Air Force FB-22 Bomber Concept, RS21848, March 21, 2005, Congressional Research Service, URI:http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RS21848.pdf.
viii Kopp C., Hardening RAAF Air Base Infrastructure, Air Power Australia Analysis 2008-02, Vol. V APA-2008-02, 5th February, 2008, URI: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2008-02.html.
ix Kopp C., People's Liberation Army Air Force and Naval Air Arm Air Base Infrastructure, Technical Report APA-TR-2007-0103, 30th January 2007, Updated 2011, URI: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-AFBs.html.
x LtCol Thomas C. Blake, Jr., Improving the Ground Survivability of In-Theater TACAIR, Air University Review, September-October 1975, URL: http://www.airpower.au.af.mil/airchronicles/aureview/1975/sep-oct/blake.html.
xi Kopp C., Andrew M., PLA Guided Bombs, Technical Report APA-TR-2009-0808, August 2009, URI:http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-GBU.html
xii O'Connor, S., PLA Ballistic Missiles, Technical Report APA-TR-2010-0802, August 2010, URI:http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-Ballistic-Missiles.html; PLA Second Artillery Corps, Technical Report APA-TR-2009-1204, URI: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-Second-Artillery-Corps.html.
xiii Kopp C., Andrew M., PLA Cruise Missiles / PLA Air - Surface Missiles, Technical Report APA-TR-2009-0803, URI:http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-Cruise-Missiles.html.
xiv Bowie C.J., The Lessons of Salty Demo, Air Force Magazine, Vol.92, No.3, March 2009, URI: http://www.airforce-magazine.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/2009/March%202009/0309salty.aspx
xv Kopp C., Assessing Joint Strike Fighter Defence Penetration Capabilities, Air Power Australia Analysis 2009-01, 7th January 2009, URI: http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2009-01.html and B-2 Variants, GlobalSecurity.org, URI:http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/b-2-variants.htm.
Chengdu J-20 stealth fighter. This design outperforms the F/A-18E/F and F-35 JSF in every important respect (Chinese Internet).
|Air Power Australia Website - http://www.ausairpower.net/|
Air Power Australia Research and Analysis - http://www.ausairpower.net/research.html
PAK-FA rendering by NPO Saturn. Unlike the JSF, the stealthy PAK-FA is being designed with air superiority performance and high agility as the primary consideration. To date only speculative renderings have been released, making assessments difficult (Saturn NPO).
|For three decades the United States has held the undisputed monopoly on the most important military technology of the Cold War era - stealth. That monopoly is set to end over the coming decade as the Russians, Indians and likely Chinese deploy a new generation of military aircraft designs. Available to any client with the cash, these high technology products will obsolete the large fleets of legacy Cold War equipment the West has relied upon since the end of the Cold War to maintain global stability, as well as rendering the planned F-35 Joint Strike Fighter impotent.|
A world in which any nation with the cash can procure stealthy manned or robotic aircraft, or cruise missiles, will be very different from the world we see now. Many of the fundamental assumptions made about America’s hitherto undisputed strategic primacy will collapse, unless Americans take stock now and start seriously planning for this future.
The Russians have two stealth aircraft designs in the current development pipeline, intended to be deployed operationally between 2010 and 2020. The Chinese are claimed to be working on a stealthy follow-on to the J-10 Sinocanard fighter, and have displayed models of supersonic stealthy unmanned vehicle designs.
The first of the two Russian designs is an unmanned robotic strike and reconnaissance vehicle, similar in concept to the US X-45 and X-47 UCAV/UCAS designs. One of the mockups, designed by the MiG bureau, was shown to Western media in 2007, and is designated the SKAT (skate). This ten tonne vehicle is a “batwing” design with a planform modelled on the US B-2A bomber, but less refined detail shaping compared to existing US designs.
The second of these designs is the PAK-FA (Перспективный Авиационный Комплекс Фронтовой Авиации - Future Aviation System For Tactical Aviation), a multirole tactical fighter intended to compete with the F-22A Raptor in the air, and with the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in the marketplace. The PAK-FA will replace the Russian Sukhoi Flanker series as the primary fighter in the Russian Air Force, and will become the principal export fighter for Russia’s booming defence industry.
The prototype of the PAK-FA was intended to fly in 2008, but has been delayed to this year, so to date no useful imagery of this design exists. The Russians have made numerous public statements which do provide some indication of what the design aims for this aircraft are: it is intended to be stealthy, highly agile to prevail in close air combat, it is intended to be fitted with an evolution of the 20 kiloWatt class NIIP N035 Irbis E phased array radar, and to be powered by a pair of 35,000 lbf class supersonic cruise turbofan engines.
On paper, these cardinal parameters put the PAK-FA in the class of the F-22A Raptor.
The first question any observer will properly ask is whether the Russians have the basic technology to design, develop, test and produce a credible state-of-the-art stealth fighter. The key technologies required for this include shaping design techniques, absorbent material and coating techniques, digital flight control technology, rectangular engine nozzle technology, engine hot end technology, and Low Probability of Intercept (LPI) digital radar and networking technology.
Shaping techniques are the most important prerequisite technology for stealth design - their purpose is to scatter radar waves illuminating an aircraft away from the threat radar. Good examples of smart shaping design include the F-117A, B-2A, YF-23A and F-22A Raptor, as well as the proposed FB-22A. The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter engine nozzle and lower fuselage areas are examples of especially poor shaping design .
Effective shaping techniques permit an aircraft to be built with a 100 to 1,000 fold lower radar signature compared to a conventional design of similar size.
The two principal tools required to perform proper rigorous shaping design are computer based simulation tools, typically based on physical optics, diffraction and surface travelling wave mathematical modelling, and measurement tools and test range facilities to verify that shapes designed on a computer actually work as intended.
With commodity desktop computers now outperforming the supercomputer technology used by US defence contractors during the 1970s and 1980s, and Russia’s surplus of high quality PhD graduates in mathematics, physics and electrical engineering, the ability of Russian industry to produce good stealth shaping design is limited only by the investment made in personnel, measurement tools and test ranges. As the SKAT UCAV mockup shows, current Russian design technique is converging on US design technique.
What is often forgotten in the West is that Russian designers have a long history of cherry-picking the best ideas from extant Western designs, incrementally improving them, and fusing them together to produce an end product that outperforms its Western predecessors. Classic examples include the AS-4 and AS-6 supersonic cruise missiles, improving on the British Blue Steel, or the Sukhoi Flanker, which fused key ideas from the US F-14, F-15 and F-16 fighters to produce an original new design outperforming all three US fighters.
With a wealth of imagery available detailing the US F-117A, B-2A, A-12A, YF-23A and F-22A Raptor, the Russians have a defacto library of sound and well proven ideas to work with. There is no need for Russian industry to reinvent the wheel, as US engineers have paved the way with a wealth of creative thinking.
Driving the signature of a stealth aircraft down further, into the size of tennisballs, golfballs and marbles, is done by the application of radar absorbent structures, materials coatings, and low signature seals, fasteners, antennas and other detail components.
Russian industry has a long history of creative and original developments in coating technologies and materials science. Recent disclosures include a coating which reduced the radar signature of the engine inlet tunnels in the Su-35BM Flanker by a factor of 30 in the centimetre radar band. Other technologies the Russians have developed include multilayer laminates which rotate the polarisation of surface travelling waves to suppress trailing edge reflections.
The Russians mastered digital flight control technology during the 1990s and have been using it in the supermanoeuvrable Su-30MKI/MKM, Su-35BM and MiG-35 designs, to an advantage. There is sufficient maturity in this technology now to make a highly manoeuvrable stealth fighter, not unlike the F-22A.
The technology of rectangular exhaust nozzles used in all proper US stealth designs to control radar and infrared signatures, is also well within the reach of Russian industry, which trialled a rectangular thrust vectoring nozzle during the early 1990s.
In terms of engine technology, the Russians built the Al-41F supercruise engine during the 1990s and since then migrated its hot end technology into the Al-31F-117S for use in the Su-35BM. A 35,000 lbf class supercruise engine for the PAK-FA is therefore a non-issue.
In radar the choice of mature Russian hybrid phased array technology for the PAK-FA over immature active array technology is a short term measure. It took US radar designers a decade to transition from the quad module technology used now in Phazotron’s Zhuk-AE to current single channel module technology. By 2020, probably sooner, the Russians will have mastered this, emulating US designs. That technology will permit the addition of the wideband frequency hopping techniques and stealthy antenna arrays, which characterise current US Low Probability of Intercept (LPI) AESA radars and top end datalinks.
The most recent generation of Russian radars use fully digital processing chains, which opens up the full gamut of sophisticated processing algorithms, which have appeared in US radars during this decade.
There can be no doubt that the Russians possess all of the basic technologies required to design an F-22 class supercruising and agile stealth fighter - the basic aerodynamic, shaping and propulsion design of the F-22 was performed over a decade ago.
When the PAK-FA is unveiled later this year we will see exactly how effective Sukhoi’s design engineers have been in fusing these technologies together to produce a new design. We can be confident that the design will be an effective supercruiser and it will be highly agile. The only uncertainty at this stage is in how stealthy it will be.
How stealthy does the PAK-FA need to be to defeat US legacy fighters? A radar cross section of only -20 dBSM would deny early Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missile shots using the AIM-120C/D AMRAAM to all current and planned US fighters. Doing any better, like -30 dBSM or -40 dBSM, simply increases the level of difficulty in prosecuting long range missile attacks.
The consequence of this is that missile combat will be compressed into shorter distances and shorter timelines, putting a premium on the stealth, supersonic persistence and close combat agility of US fighters. A larger portion of engagements will be at visual range, and most BVR engagements will end up taking place inside 30 nautical miles.
Only the F-22A Raptor is viable in an air combat environment where the PAK-FA is deployed, and the F-22A will not provide a 144:0 kill ratio against the PAK-FA.
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter struggles to survive against the conventional Su-35BM Flanker, with only its -30 dBSM class front sector stealth keeping it alive in some BVR combat situations. Against even a -20 dBSM class PAK-FA, the F-35 falls within the survivability black hole, into which US legacy fighters such as the F-16C/E, F-15C/E and F/A-18A-F have already fallen.
Americans need to start thinking about which strategic niche they wish to occupy in 2020. The stealth monopoly cannot last forever, and the US must now confront the prospect of a future in which the asymmetric advantage of US stealth is no longer absolute, but rather incremental.
There is a big difference, operationally and strategically, in using stealthy jets against opponents who have none, versus using stealthy jets against opponents who also use stealthy jets. Incremental differences in stealth performance will matter, but much less in such “symmetric” stealth vs. stealth conflicts, compared to past asymmetric conflicts.
The most fundamental and immediate conclusion is that US planning for the future of its fighter fleet must be architected around the F-22A Raptor and improved future derivatives, since only this aircraft will be survivable in a future globalised market for stealthy combat aircraft.
Photo: WEF The Australian continent has a remarkable history — a story of isolation, desiccation and resilience on an ark at the edge ...
(1) BISMILLAH (Dengan Nama Allah) Barangsiapa membaca sebanyak 21 kali ketika hendak tidur, nescaya terpelihara dari godaan dan gang...
Jalan di Newbury ditutup pada 5 Julai selepas lori West Berkshire Council terbenam ke jalan raya ekoran cuaca panas Foto Sumber: Express...
Photo By: MOLE.MY OH INI SEBENARNYA : Lembaga Tabung Haji (Tabung Haji) memaklumkan pengiraan hibah atau bonus bagi tahun kewangan 20...