Wednesday, 10 May 2017
DISEDIAKAN OLEH: MOHD EZLI MASHUT
"A new page of our history has turned this evening, I want that page to be one of hope and refound trust, the renewal of our public life, will be at the base of what I do from the very first day of our presidency." : Emmanuel Macron- Louvre in Paris - 8 MEI 2017
Siapa pemuda berumur 39 tahun itu?
Nama penuhnya adalah Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron. Beliau lahir pada 21 Disember 1977. Sekarang beliau berumur 39 tahun. Beliau adalah bekas kakitangan awam dan pernah menjadi pelabur perbankan.
Belajar falsafah di Paris Nanterre University dan Master dalam Hal Ehwal Awam di Sciences Po, dan menamatkan pengajian the École nationale d'administration (ENA) in 2004.
Diusia 39 tahun, Macron menjadi Presiden Perancis termuda dalam sejarah sejak Napoleon Bonaparte.
Macron jadi Pengasas Partai En Marche!
Parti En Marche! diasaskan pada 6 April 2016. Macron mendirikan parti ini sebagai sebuah parti sosial-liberal politik di Perancis. Pada waktu itu, beliau sebagai Menteri Ekonomi dan Kewangan. Kini parti tersebut dipimpin oleh Catherine Barbaroux.
Sekarang keahlian En Marche sudah mencecah 285,000 dalam masa 13 bulan.
Gerakan ini bakal dijenamakan semula menjadi La République En Marche" pada 15 Julai.
Parti itu merancang untuk bertanding sebanyak 577 kerusi parlimen pada pilihan raya akan dayang dan menjangkakan 50 peratus calon dari kalangan wanita.
Pro Imigran, Membela Komuniti Muslim
Pada topik imigran, Emmanuel Macron cenderung pro-imigran. Beliau memilih menolak menutup sempadan Perancis daripada “serbuan” para imigran.
Selain itu, Macron juga membela komuniti Muslim yang mengalami perlakuan tidak adil di Eropah.
"Tidak ada agama yang menjadi masalah di Perancis hari ini,” kata Macron dalam sebuah demonstrasi di bulan Oktober 2016.
”Jika negara bersikap neutral, kita memiliki kewajiban untuk membiarkan semua orang mempraktikkan agama mereka dengan harga diri,” katanya.
Apa yang Emmanuel Macron buat untuk menang pilihanraya Presiden Perancis sejak 13 bulan lalu? INI PALING PENTING DIKAJI!
1. Menggerakkan sukarelawan yang selama ini tidak pernah terlibat dalam politik dengan latar belakang berbeza.
2. Gerak kerja kempennya dianggap bukan memihak kepada pihak haluan kira atau kanan.
3. Cara kempen yang dianggap satu revolusi daripada gerak kerja sistem lama dan parti politik malahan gaya kempen 'ala gerila' yang lebih fleksibel, pantas bergerak serta cepat membuat keputusan.
4. Secara kasarnya gaya kempen adalah 'door-to-door operation' apabila pasukan sukarelawan berdialog dengan masyarakat awam apa yang tidak kena dengan sistem di Perancis.
5. Melaksanakan penyertaan bersama secara atas talian. Ia lebih kepada gerak mula penubuhan seperti syarikat teknologi beroperasi berbanding sistem klasik politik.
6. Memanfaatkan sistem teknologi digital untuk memahami data sistem pengundian dan sasaran pengundi.
7. Tanpa sebarang asas kewangan seperti parti politik, gerakan itu dibiayai melalui derma yang dibenarkan undang-undang pada €7,500 (£6,370) seorang.
8. Sebanyak €6.5 juta berjaya dikumpulkan dengan purata derma €250 atau kurang. Malahan Macron membuat pinjaman peribadi sebanyak €8 juta.
9. Para sukarelawan bertemu dan berdialog dengan pengundi sasaran memperdebatkan polisi Kerajaan Perancis pada peringkat akar umbi di seluruh negara.
“There’s a freedom, there’s no hierarchy, it’s about spurring on your team of volunteers, it’s so much more human and we feel like we’re building something together,” said Garcia, 49, who preferred canvassing with En Marche!
“I joined because I don’t want the same old people running politics. We need change, people from civil society,” said Sophie Solmini, 44, a former Socialist party canvasser who had taken time off from her housing association job to volunteer for Macron “seven days a week from 7am to 2am” from her council flat.
Apa Manifesto Macron:
1. Melaksanakan reformasi terhadap sistem kebajikan dan pencen untuk rakyat.
2. Mahu memperkukuh usaha melawan keganasan dengan meningkatkan perbelanjaan pertahanan serta menambah lebih 10,000 anggota polis untuk memerangi ancaman terrorisme.
3. Pro kepada dasar Kesatuan Eropah dan berjanji meletakkan kembali status Perancis sebagai tunjang kekuatan EU.
4. Mahu memperkukuh kerjasama diplomatik dengan antarabangsa seperti Amerika Syarikat, Rusia, Iran, Turki dan Arab Saudi serta menyelesaikan isu Syria.
5. Mengurangkan perbelanjaan awam. Memotong cukai perniagaan serta memberikan insentif kepada firma yang menawarkan kerja tetap serta mewujudkan keusahawanan baru.
6. Menetapkan kerja selama 35 jam seminggu dengan sistem fleksibel berdasarakan kawasan. Negeri akan mengambil urusan isu insuran pengangguran.
AKHIRNYA: Beliau berjaya memperolehi 66.1 peratus undian semasa pemilihan Presiden meninggalkan Marine Le Pen yang hanya memperolehi 33.0 peratus undian.
Belum pernah berlaku dalam sejarah moden Pemilihan Presiden Perancis apabila jawatan itu dimenangi individu dinaungi sistem parti politik dibelakangya.
Saturday, 22 April 2017
OLEH: MOHD EZLI MASHUT
INI KISAH KAMI. Rakyat MARHAEN. Kisah Orang Kampung. Melawan salah, tak lawan lagilah salah. Kami bukan anti pembangunan dan projek. Kami hanya mahukan sedikit pembelaan dan perhatian.
TERBURUK dalam sejarah lebih 50 tahun. Itu gambaran banjir lumpur tanah merah yang melanda kampung kami di Kampong Harmoni Batu 28 Ijok di DUN Ijok Parlimen Kuala Selangor pada 18 April 2017 lalu.
Dalam kejadian itu, seramai 16 keluarga terpaksa dipindahkan ke pusat pemindahan selepas banjir melanda kawasan itu. Banyak barangan rosak serta tidak dapat diselamatkan. Malahan sebenarnya ramai keluarga tidak berpindah bimbangkan faktor keselamatan rumah serta perkara lain.
Air banjir kali ini bukan seperti selalu sebelum ini. Berkelodak dan berlumpur berwarna merah. Pelik. Selalu air banjir tidak merah seperti ini. Dari mana datangnya air merah ini?. Penerokaan kawasan bukit untuk pembangunan? kenapa kami Orang Kampung jadi mangsa?
Penulis yang mengalami detik cemas bencana alam itu sendiri merasakan banjir yang berlaku terburuk setakat ini boleh dikurangkan jika perancangan pembangunan sekeliling diurus rapi serta memastikan sistem saliran dalam keadaan terbaik mengelakkan bencana berulang.
Kejadian banjir lumpur kali ini teruk kerana selepas banjir berakhir kesan lumpur meninggalkan kawasan dalam rumah serta sekeliling seumpama berada di 'Planet Marikh' yang selama ini tidak pernah dialami penduduk.
Rasanya sejak dari kecil, ini bukan kali pertama banjir berlaku di kawasan ini, entah berapa kali berlaku sejak sekian lama apabila limpahan air dari kawasan tinggi berlaku menyebabkan kawasan rendah di kampung ini digenangi air.
Ia bukan sekadar banjir kilat. Kadang-kadang ia mengambil lebih seminggu untuk air surut sepenuhnya di kawasan digenangi air. Puncanya adalah sistem saliran yang tidak sistematik dan tidak boleh berfungsi baik jika berlaku hujan lebat 'luar biasa'.
Memburukkan keadaan kadang-kadang kawasan kebun kelapa sawit digenangi air lebih seminggu sehingga menyukarkan pekebun kecil untuk memetik buah
Apa pihak berkuasa dan agensi bertanggungjawab buat? sudah laksanakan tugas dan pemantauan? Apakah tiada pampasan dan ganti rugi diberikan kepada mangsa terlibat?
Kisah dan cerita ini mungkin berita kecil kepada media. Yelah...CNN, BBC, AL-JAZEERA tak ambil tahu pun...Media Malaysia lagilah tak kisah... takde siapa kisah dan peduli nasib penduduk bencana alam yang bakal menimpa kelak di masa hadapan. Ia bagaikan bom jangka. Hujan luar biasa kampung kami jadi mangsa.
Apa yang kami kisahkan adalah projek pembangunan di sekeliling kampung kami yang menjadi ancaman. Ke mana air dilepaskan jika hujan luar biasa? Kampung Kami jadi mangsa. Siapa pemaju? siapa beri kelulusan? siapa merancang projek pembangunan? itu kami tak tahu.
Apalah sangat kami ini, bagaikan mentimun. Melanggar pun sakit, kena langgar lagilah sakit.
Ini kisah kami hadapi. Bukan kisah politik dan tular. Kisah penduduk menuntut pembelaan ada di mana-mana. Mungkin kisah sama penduduk berhadapan pemaju, kerajaan ada di Kelantan, Johor, Sabah dan Sarawak. Jika kami penduduk tak bersuara, maka kami terus jadi mangsa.
Jika kisah ini tular di media sosial dengan 100,000 share. Mungkin baru ada pihak buka mata agaknya.
ANTARA PUNCA BANJIR
Projek Pelebaran Jalan Persekutuan FT54 antara punca banjir kali ini semakin buruk. Parit sedia ada dikecilkan sehingga suku menyebabkan aliran air di kawasan Kampong Harmoni terjejas teruk.
Pihak berkuasa seperi Jabatan Kerja Raja (JKR), Jabatan Parit Saliran dan Tali Air (JPS) serta pihak kontraktor pembinaan jalan perlu memberikan penjelasan kenapa banjir kali ini semakin teruk berbanding kejadian lepas.
Penduduk juga mempersoalkan kaedah operasi standard (SOP) digunakan serta pemantauan pihak berkuasa apabila saliran parit ditimbus sehingga suku sebelum memperbaiki saliran sedia ada sedangkan kawasan itu adalah hotspot banjir walaupun hujan berlaku dalam tempoh tidak lama.
Malahan penduduk mengemukakan persoalan bagaimana banjir lumpur semakin kerap berlaku di kawasan ini, apakah wujud projek di kawasan kampung ini yang tidak mematuhi piawaian alam sekitar yang menyebabkan aliran air lumpur semakin deras menuju kawasan kampung.
Penduduk mahu Ahli Dewan Negeri (ADN) dan Ahli Parlimen proaktif menjadi jurubicara rakyat dan mencari jalan segera menyelesaikan masalah penduduk yang sekian lama 'menderita' dengan bencana alam yang boleh diuruskan baik jika ada perancangan dan pelaksanaan pelan tindakan.
Kita tidak mahu bencana alam banjir lumpur lebih buruk berlaku di masa hadapan ekoran pembangunan semakin rancak yang berlaku di sekeliling. Agensi Kerajaan berkait alam sekitar perlu memantau dan tegas jika ada pelanggaran peraturan dan undang-undang alam sekitar berlaku.
Kurangnya pokok dan tumbuhan untuk menyerap air hujan menjadi salah satu faktor berlakunya banjir semakin teruk akibat kerakusan projek pembangunan di kawasan sekeliling.
SESUATU PERLU DILAKUKAN SEGERA
Kejadian banjir kilat dan lumpur bukan sahaja semakin kerap berlaku di kawasan ini malahan di negara ini. Aspek perancangan pembangunan masa hadapan perlu mengambil kira faktor cuaca luar biasa bagi mengurangkan impak bencana alam.
Agensi kerajaan dan swasta juga perlu memainkan peranan proaktif dan tidak bersikap 'bangau oh bangau' menuding jari pihak lain jika berlaku sebarang kejadian bencana alam yang sebenarnya boleh dikurangkan kesannya atau dielakkan langsung.
Pemeliharaan alam dan hutan serta penjagaan dan penyelenggaran saliran, parit dan sungai perlu dipertingkatkan dari semasa ke semasa. Jika dahulu sungai mampu mengalirkan sejumlah air yang banyak dalam sesuatu masa,kini pengaliran telah berkurangan.
Ini disebabkan proses pemendapan dan pembuangan bahan-bahan buangan. Kerajaan perlu menjalankan proses pendalaman sungai dengan mengorek semua lumpur dan kekotoran yang menyekat arus air.
Proses pembangunan perlu seimbang dan mesra alam bagi mengelakkan kejadian banjir kilat dan lumpur. Sistem dan SOP pengurusan banjir juga perlu dikemaskini dari semasa ke semasa supaya lebih praktikal bukan sahaja mencegah banjir berlaku malahan membantu mangsa pasca banjir.
Pembentukan pasukan khas atur cepat yang dilengkapi jentera dan peralatan mencukupi perlu dipersiapkan setiap masa yang boleh bertindak pantas digerakkan di kawasan terjejas tanpa dipengaruhi karenah biokrasi dan perbezaan fahaman politik.
HAPUSKAN RASUAH, SALAH GUNA KUASA
Kemungkinan bencana banjir buruk berlaku di negara ini berulang adalah sangat tinggi jika tiada sebarang tindakan susulan diambil.
Sebelum ini, Presiden MAPIM, Mohd Azmi Abdul Hamid pernah berkata di media usaha memerangi rasuah juga harus menjadi agenda utama bagi mengelakkan eksploitasi alam sekitar.
Katanya rasuah menyebabkan alam sekitar terdedah kepada salah guna kuasa yang boleh memburukkan lagi kerosakan alam.
"Masalah utama bukan kerana tidak ada polisi dan peraturan, sebaliknya isu paling besar ialah kelemahan perlaksanaan dan pengawalan,” katanya.
Pihak berkuasa dan pemaju juga pula perlu lebih bertanggungjawab terhadap pembangunan yang hendak diadakan.
Jangan terlalu memikirkan wang semata-mata. Perancangan awal yang lebih teratur amat diperlukan bagi mengelakkan bencana buatan manusia memangsakan manusia lain menjadi lebih parah.
* MOHD EZLI MASHUT merupakan salah seorang mangsa kejadian banjir lumpur Kampong Harmoni, Ijok.
Wednesday, 11 January 2017
It's good to be home. My fellow Americans, Michelle and I have been so touched by all the well-wishes we've received over the past few weeks. But tonight it's my turn to say thanks. Whether we've seen eye-to-eye or rarely agreed at all, my conversations with you, the American people - in living rooms and schools; at farms and on factory floors; at diners and on distant outposts - are what have kept me honest, kept me inspired, and kept me going. Every day, I learned from you. You made me a better President, and you made me a better man.
I first came to Chicago when I was in my early twenties, still trying to figure out who I was; still searching for a purpose to my life. It was in neighborhoods not far from here where I began working with church groups in the shadows of closed steel mills. It was on these streets where I witnessed the power of faith, and the quiet dignity of working people in the face of struggle and loss. This is where I learned that change only happens when ordinary people get involved, get engaged, and come together to demand it.
After eight years as your President, I still believe that. And it's not just my belief. It's the beating heart of our American idea - our bold experiment in self-government.
It's the conviction that we are all created equal, endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, among them life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
It's the insistence that these rights, while self-evident, have never been self-executing; that We, the People, through the instrument of our democracy, can form a more perfect union.
This is the great gift our Founders gave us. The freedom to chase our individual dreams through our sweat, toil, and imagination - and the imperative to strive together as well, to achieve a greater good.
For 240 years, our nation's call to citizenship has given work and purpose to each new generation. It's what led patriots to choose republic over tyranny, pioneers to trek west, slaves to brave that makeshift railroad to freedom. It's what pulled immigrants and refugees across oceans and the Rio Grande, pushed women to reach for the ballot, powered workers to organize. It's why GIs gave their lives at Omaha Beach and Iwo Jima; Iraq and Afghanistan - and why men and women from Selma to Stonewall were prepared to give theirs as well.
So that's what we mean when we say America is exceptional. Not that our nation has been flawless from the start, but that we have shown the capacity to change, and make life better for those who follow.
Yes, our progress has been uneven. The work of democracy has always been hard, contentious and sometimes bloody. For every two steps forward, it often feels we take one step back. But the long sweep of America has been defined by forward motion, a constant widening of our founding creed to embrace all, and not just some.
If I had told you eight years ago that America would reverse a great recession, reboot our auto industry, and unleash the longest stretch of job creation in our history . if I had told you that we would open up a new chapter with the Cuban people, shut down Iran's nuclear weapons program without firing a shot, and take out the mastermind of 9/11 . if I had told you that we would win marriage equality, and secure the right to health insurance for another 20 million of our fellow citizens - you might have said our sights were set a little too high.
But that's what we did. That's what you did. You were the change. You answered people's hopes, and because of you, by almost every measure, America is a better, stronger place than it was when we started.
In ten days, the world will witness a hallmark of our democracy: the peaceful transfer of power from one freely-elected president to the next. I committed to President-Elect Trump that my administration would ensure the smoothest possible transition, just as President Bush did for me. Because it's up to all of us to make sure our government can help us meet the many challenges we still face.
We have what we need to do so. After all, we remain the wealthiest, most powerful, and most respected nation on Earth. Our youth and drive, our diversity and openness, our boundless capacity for risk and reinvention mean that the future should be ours.
But that potential will be realized only if our democracy works. Only if our politics reflects the decency of the people. Only if all of us, regardless of our party affiliation or particular interest, help restore the sense of common purpose that we so badly need right now.
That's what I want to focus on tonight - the state of our democracy.
Understand, democracy does not require uniformity. Our founders quarreled and compromised, and expected us to do the same. But they knew that democracy does require a basic sense of solidarity - the idea that for all our outward differences, we are all in this together; that we rise or fall as one.
There have been moments throughout our history that threatened to rupture that solidarity. The beginning of this century has been one of those times. A shrinking world, growing inequality; demographic change and the specter of terrorism - these forces haven't just tested our security and prosperity, but our democracy as well. And how we meet these challenges to our democracy will determine our ability to educate our kids, and create good jobs, and protect our homeland.
In other words, it will determine our future.
Our democracy won't work without a sense that everyone has economic opportunity. Today, the economy is growing again; wages, incomes, home values, and retirement accounts are rising again; poverty is falling again. The wealthy are paying a fairer share of taxes even as the stock market shatters records. The unemployment rate is near a ten-year low. The uninsured rate has never, ever been lower. Health care costs are rising at the slowest rate in fifty years. And if anyone can put together a plan that is demonstrably better than the improvements we've made to our health care system - that covers as many people at less cost - I will publicly support it.
That, after all, is why we serve - to make people's lives better, not worse.
But for all the real progress we've made, we know it's not enough. Our economy doesn't work as well or grow as fast when a few prosper at the expense of a growing middle class. But stark inequality is also corrosive to our democratic principles. While the top one percent has amassed a bigger share of wealth and income, too many families, in inner cities and rural counties, have been left behind - the laid-off factory worker; the waitress and health care worker who struggle to pay the bills - convinced that the game is fixed against them, that their government only serves the interests of the powerful - a recipe for more cynicism and polarization in our politics.
There are no quick fixes to this long-term trend. I agree that our trade should be fair and not just free. But the next wave of economic dislocation won't come from overseas. It will come from the relentless pace of automation that makes many good, middle-class jobs obsolete.
And so we must forge a new social compact - to guarantee all our kids the education they need; to give workers the power to unionize for better wages; to update the social safety net to reflect the way we live now and make more reforms to the tax code so corporations and individuals who reap the most from the new economy don't avoid their obligations to the country that's made their success possible. We can argue about how to best achieve these goals. But we can't be complacent about the goals themselves. For if we don't create opportunity for all people, the disaffection and division that has stalled our progress will only sharpen in years to come.
There's a second threat to our democracy - one as old as our nation itself. After my election, there was talk of a post-racial America. Such a vision, however well-intended, was never realistic. For race remains a potent and often divisive force in our society. I've lived long enough to know that race relations are better than they were ten, or twenty, or thirty years ago - you can see it not just in statistics, but in the attitudes of young Americans across the political spectrum.
But we're not where we need to be. All of us have more work to do. After all, if every economic issue is framed as a struggle between a hardworking white middle class and undeserving minorities, then workers of all shades will be left fighting for scraps while the wealthy withdraw further into their private enclaves. If we decline to invest in the children of immigrants, just because they don't look like us, we diminish the prospects of our own children - because those brown kids will represent a larger share of America's workforce. And our economy doesn't have to be a zero-sum game. Last year, incomes rose for all races, all age groups, for men and for women.
Going forward, we must uphold laws against discrimination - in hiring, in housing, in education and the criminal justice system. That's what our Constitution and highest ideals require. But laws alone won't be enough. Hearts must change. If our democracy is to work in this increasingly diverse nation, each one of us must try to heed the advice of one of the great characters in American fiction, Atticus Finch, who said "You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view.until you climb into his skin and walk around in it."
For blacks and other minorities, it means tying our own struggles for justice to the challenges that a lot of people in this country face - the refugee, the immigrant, the rural poor, the transgender American, and also the middle-aged white man who from the outside may seem like he's got all the advantages, but who's seen his world upended by economic, cultural, and technological change.
For white Americans, it means acknowledging that the effects of slavery and Jim Crow didn't suddenly vanish in the '60s; that when minority groups voice discontent, they're not just engaging in reverse racism or practicing political correctness; that when they wage peaceful protest, they're not demanding special treatment, but the equal treatment our Founders promised.
For native-born Americans, it means reminding ourselves that the stereotypes about immigrants today were said, almost word for word, about the Irish, Italians, and Poles. America wasn't weakened by the presence of these newcomers; they embraced this nation's creed, and it was strengthened.
So regardless of the station we occupy; we have to try harder; to start with the premise that each of our fellow citizens loves this country just as much as we do; that they value hard work and family like we do; that their children are just as curious and hopeful and worthy of love as our own.
None of this is easy. For too many of us, it's become safer to retreat into our own bubbles, whether in our neighborhoods or college campuses or places of worship or our social media feeds, surrounded by people who look like us and share the same political outlook and never challenge our assumptions. The rise of naked partisanship, increasing economic and regional stratification, the splintering of our media into a channel for every taste - all this makes this great sorting seem natural, even inevitable. And increasingly, we become so secure in our bubbles that we accept only information, whether true or not, that fits our opinions, instead of basing our opinions on the evidence that's out there.
This trend represents a third threat to our democracy. Politics is a battle of ideas; in the course of a healthy debate, we'll prioritize different goals, and the different means of reaching them. But without some common baseline of facts; without a willingness to admit new information, and concede that your opponent is making a fair point, and that science and reason matter, we'll keep talking past each other, making common ground and compromise impossible.
Isn't that part of what makes politics so dispiriting? How can elected officials rage about deficits when we propose to spend money on preschool for kids, but not when we're cutting taxes for corporations? How do we excuse ethical lapses in our own party, but pounce when the other party does the same thing? It's not just dishonest, this selective sorting of the facts; it's self-defeating. Because as my mother used to tell me, reality has a way of catching up with you.
Take the challenge of climate change. In just eight years, we've halved our dependence on foreign oil, doubled our renewable energy, and led the world to an agreement that has the promise to save this planet. But without bolder action, our children won't have time to debate the existence of climate change; they'll be busy dealing with its effects: environmental disasters, economic disruptions, and waves of climate refugees seeking sanctuary.
Now, we can and should argue about the best approach to the problem. But to simply deny the problem not only betrays future generations; it betrays the essential spirit of innovation and practical problem-solving that guided our Founders.
It's that spirit, born of the Enlightenment, that made us an economic powerhouse - the spirit that took flight at Kitty Hawk and Cape Canaveral; the spirit that that cures disease and put a computer in every pocket.
It's that spirit - a faith in reason, and enterprise, and the primacy of right over might, that allowed us to resist the lure of fascism and tyranny during the Great Depression, and build a post-World War II order with other democracies, an order based not just on military power or national affiliations but on principles - the rule of law, human rights, freedoms of religion, speech, assembly, and an independent press.
That order is now being challenged - first by violent fanatics who claim to speak for Islam; more recently by autocrats in foreign capitals who see free markets, open democracies, and civil society itself as a threat to their power. The peril each poses to our democracy is more far-reaching than a car bomb or a missile. It represents the fear of change; the fear of people who look or speak or pray differently; a contempt for the rule of law that holds leaders accountable; an intolerance of dissent and free thought; a belief that the sword or the gun or the bomb or propaganda machine is the ultimate arbiter of what's true and what's right.
Because of the extraordinary courage of our men and women in uniform, and the intelligence officers, law enforcement, and diplomats who support them, no foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland these past eight years; and although Boston and Orlando remind us of how dangerous radicalization can be, our law enforcement agencies are more effective and vigilant than ever. We've taken out tens of thousands of terrorists - including Osama bin Laden. The global coalition we're leading against ISIL has taken out their leaders, and taken away about half their territory. ISIL will be destroyed, and no one who threatens America will ever be safe. To all who serve, it has been the honor of my lifetime to be your Commander-in-Chief.
But protecting our way of life requires more than our military. Democracy can buckle when we give in to fear. So just as we, as citizens, must remain vigilant against external aggression, we must guard against a weakening of the values that make us who we are. That's why, for the past eight years, I've worked to put the fight against terrorism on a firm legal footing. That's why we've ended torture, worked to close Gitmo, and reform our laws governing surveillance to protect privacy and civil liberties. That's why I reject discrimination against Muslim Americans. That's why we cannot withdraw from global fights - to expand democracy, and human rights, women's rights, and LGBT rights - no matter how imperfect our efforts, no matter how expedient ignoring such values may seem. For the fight against extremism and intolerance and sectarianism are of a piece with the fight against authoritarianism and nationalist aggression. If the scope of freedom and respect for the rule of law shrinks around the world, the likelihood of war within and between nations increases, and our own freedoms will eventually be threatened.
So let's be vigilant, but not afraid. ISIL will try to kill innocent people. But they cannot defeat America unless we betray our Constitution and our principles in the fight. Rivals like Russia or China cannot match our influence around the world - unless we give up what we stand for, and turn ourselves into just another big country that bullies smaller neighbors.
Which brings me to my final point - our democracy is threatened whenever we take it for granted. All of us, regardless of party, should throw ourselves into the task of rebuilding our democratic institutions. When voting rates are some of the lowest among advanced democracies, we should make it easier, not harder, to vote. When trust in our institutions is low, we should reduce the corrosive influence of money in our politics, and insist on the principles of transparency and ethics in public service. When Congress is dysfunctional, we should draw our districts to encourage politicians to cater to common sense and not rigid extremes.
And all of this depends on our participation; on each of us accepting the responsibility of citizenship, regardless of which way the pendulum of power swings.
Our Constitution is a remarkable, beautiful gift. But it's really just a piece of parchment. It has no power on its own. We, the people, give it power - with our participation, and the choices we make. Whether or not we stand up for our freedoms. Whether or not we respect and enforce the rule of law. America is no fragile thing. But the gains of our long journey to freedom are not assured.
In his own farewell address, George Washington wrote that self-government is the underpinning of our safety, prosperity, and liberty, but "from different causes and from different quarters much pains will be taken.to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth;" that we should preserve it with "jealous anxiety;" that we should reject "the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest or to enfeeble the sacred ties" that make us one.
We weaken those ties when we allow our political dialogue to become so corrosive that people of good character are turned off from public service; so coarse with rancor that Americans with whom we disagree are not just misguided, but somehow malevolent. We weaken those ties when we define some of us as more American than others; when we write off the whole system as inevitably corrupt, and blame the leaders we elect without examining our own role in electing them.
It falls to each of us to be those anxious, jealous guardians of our democracy; to embrace the joyous task we've been given to continually try to improve this great nation of ours. Because for all our outward differences, we all share the same proud title: Citizen.
Ultimately, that's what our democracy demands. It needs you. Not just when there's an election, not just when your own narrow interest is at stake, but over the full span of a lifetime. If you're tired of arguing with strangers on the internet, try to talk with one in real life. If something needs fixing, lace up your shoes and do some organizing. If you're disappointed by your elected officials, grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office yourself. Show up. Dive in. Persevere. Sometimes you'll win. Sometimes you'll lose. Presuming a reservoir of goodness in others can be a risk, and there will be times when the process disappoints you. But for those of us fortunate enough to have been a part of this work, to see it up close, let me tell you, it can energize and inspire. And more often than not, your faith in America - and in Americans - will be confirmed.
Mine sure has been. Over the course of these eight years, I've seen the hopeful faces of young graduates and our newest military officers. I've mourned with grieving families searching for answers, and found grace in Charleston church. I've seen our scientists help a paralyzed man regain his sense of touch, and our wounded warriors walk again. I've seen our doctors and volunteers rebuild after earthquakes and stop pandemics in their tracks. I've seen the youngest of children remind us of our obligations to care for refugees, to work in peace, and above all to look out for each other.
That faith I placed all those years ago, not far from here, in the power of ordinary Americans to bring about change - that faith has been rewarded in ways I couldn't possibly have imagined. I hope yours has, too. Some of you here tonight or watching at home were there with us in 2004, in 2008, in 2012 - and maybe you still can't believe we pulled this whole thing off.
You're not the only ones. Michelle - for the past twenty-five years, you've been not only my wife and mother of my children, but my best friend. You took on a role you didn't ask for and made it your own with grace and grit and style and good humor. You made the White House a place that belongs to everybody. And a new generation sets its sights higher because it has you as a role model. You've made me proud. You've made the country proud.
Malia and Sasha, under the strangest of circumstances, you have become two amazing young women, smart and beautiful, but more importantly, kind and thoughtful and full of passion. You wore the burden of years in the spotlight so easily. Of all that I've done in my life, I'm most proud to be your dad.
To Joe Biden, the scrappy kid from Scranton who became Delaware's favorite son: you were the first choice I made as a nominee, and the best. Not just because you have been a great Vice President, but because in the bargain, I gained a brother. We love you and Jill like family, and your friendship has been one of the great joys of our life.
To my remarkable staff: For eight years - and for some of you, a whole lot more - I've drawn from your energy, and tried to reflect back what you displayed every day: heart, and character, and idealism. I've watched you grow up, get married, have kids, and start incredible new journeys of your own. Even when times got tough and frustrating, you never let Washington get the better of you. The only thing that makes me prouder than all the good we've done is the thought of all the remarkable things you'll achieve from here.
And to all of you out there - every organizer who moved to an unfamiliar town and kind family who welcomed them in, every volunteer who knocked on doors, every young person who cast a ballot for the first time, every American who lived and breathed the hard work of change - you are the best supporters and organizers anyone could hope for, and I will forever be grateful. Because yes, you changed the world.
That's why I leave this stage tonight even more optimistic about this country than I was when we started. Because I know our work has not only helped so many Americans; it has inspired so many Americans - especially so many young people out there - to believe you can make a difference; to hitch your wagon to something bigger than yourselves. This generation coming up - unselfish, altruistic, creative, patriotic - I've seen you in every corner of the country. You believe in a fair, just, inclusive America; you know that constant change has been America's hallmark, something not to fear but to embrace, and you are willing to carry this hard work of democracy forward. You'll soon outnumber any of us, and I believe as a result that the future is in good hands.
My fellow Americans, it has been the honor of my life to serve you. I won't stop; in fact, I will be right there with you, as a citizen, for all my days that remain. For now, whether you're young or young at heart, I do have one final ask of you as your President - the same thing I asked when you took a chance on me eight years ago.
I am asking you to believe. Not in my ability to bring about change - but in yours.
I am asking you to hold fast to that faith written into our founding documents; that idea whispered by slaves and abolitionists; that spirit sung by immigrants and homesteaders and those who marched for justice; that creed reaffirmed by those who planted flags from foreign battlefields to the surface of the moon; a creed at the core of every American whose story is not yet written:
Yes We Can.
Yes We Did.
Yes We Can.
Thank you. God bless you. And may God continue to bless the United States of America.
Tuesday, 8 November 2016
OLEH MOHD EZLI MASHUT
Henry Ford :
''Jika terdapat sesuatu yang tidak kena dalam sesebuah negara, anda akan dapati ia dari Yahudi-Freemason.''
(The International Jew, 1922)
KUASAI AMERIKA KUASAI DUNIA
Pemilihan Presiden Amerika Syarikat ke-45 sama ada Hillary Clinton atau Donald J Trump tidak memberikan harapan baru kepada dunia khususnya keamanan dunia dan nasib umat Islam.
Siapa yang bakal mengangkat sumpah sebagai Presiden Amerika Syarikat pada 20 Januari 2017 ini peneraju White House bakal terjawab apabila rakyat Amerika mengundi pada 8 November.
Beliau juga menjadi 'pemegang kunci' yang boleh melancarkan senjata nuklear kepada mana-mana negara dan boleh mengarahkan perang bila-bila dan di mana sahaja.
Ketika ini terdapat kira-kira 16,300 senjata nuklear di seluruh dunia yang mana daripada jumlah itu, 7,300 milik Amerika Syarikat (AS), Rusia (8,000), China (240), Perancis (300), United Kingdom (225), Israel (80), India (80-100), Pakistan (90-110) dan Korea Utara (1).
Buku "Nuclear Weapons: The State of Play" menyatakan bahawa risiko perang nuklear semakin meningkat di sebalik jumlah senjata nuklear yang lebih kecil berbanding sewaktu Perang Dingin.
Menurut senarai yang dikeluarkan Global Firepower (GFP), penyedia data terkini kuasa ketenteraan dunia, tanpa mengambil kira kekuatan nuklear yang dimiliki sesebuah negara, Amerika Syarikat (AS) berada di kedudukan teratas negara paling kuat daripada segi ketenteraan pada masa ini.
Kelebihan Amerika ternyata didorong oleh sumber kewangan negara itu sendiri.
Amerika dilaporkan memperuntukkan kira-kira AS$689 bilion (RM2.2 trilion) sebagai bajet pertahanan negara itulebih tinggi berbanding negara kuasa-kuasa besar yang lain.
Faktor itu memungkinkan AS untuk memiliki sekurang-kurangnya 8,235 kereta kebal dan 15,293 buah pesawat dan 6,665 helikopter.
Aset itu bagaimanapun tidak termasuk kira-kira 10 buah kapal pengangkut pesawat yang memudahkan AS menggerakkan askarnya ke mana-mana negara di seluruh dunia dengan diiringi 71 kapal selam.
DONALD TRUMP ATAU HILLARY CLINTON?
Donald Trump yang bertanding atas tiket Republican dan Hillary Clinton yang meneruskan tradisi suaminya dari parti Demokratik menarik perhatian seluruh dunia kepada pemilihan bakal peneraju negara uncle Sam kuasa dunia.
Kedua-duanya menawarkan rakyat dua jenis manifesto yang berbeza yang harus dinilai rakyat sewajarnya.
Hillary Clinton adalah ikon tidak asing lagi di kalangan pengundi Demokratik dan bakal mencipta sejarah sebagai Presiden wanita pertama untuk Amerika Syarikat.
Calon Parti Republikan, Donald Trump tidak popular di kalangan masyarakat antarabangsa khususnya dasarnya terhadap orang Islam menarik perhatian puak pelampau di Amerika.
Keadaan itu boleh mencetuskan perang besar-besaran di seluruh dunia khususnya dunia Islam dengan menggunakan alasan menentang keganasan.
Pengaruh lobi Yahudi itu amat besar di kalangan pengundi di Amerika, maka setiap calon terpaksa jadi pro Israel. Akan tetapi Donald Trump jelas menyuarakan sikap anti Islam seperti ajaran agama Yahudi dan Nasrani.
'THE HIDDEN HAND'
Dunia perlu sedar ketika mana harapan dan perubahan disandarkan kepada Barack Obama untuk dunia lebih aman, stabil dan makmur namun pergolakan di Asia Barat terus berpanjangan dengan angka korban meningkat setiap hari khususnya krisis di Syria, Libya, Iraq, Palestin dan Afghanistan.
Obama tidak 'berkuasa' sebenarnya. Beliau adalah 'boneka' kepada percaturan politik dimainkan oleh ' The Hidden Hand'.
Kerajaan rahsia ini dipimpin oleh orang-orang misteri yang digelar para penyelidik konspirasi sebagai 'The Hidden Hand'.
Keluarga Rothschild 'sangat berkuasa' sehingga hari ini. Mereka menubuhkan pelbagai organisasi NGO yang berprofil tinggi di seluruh dunia dan menguasai pelbagai industri yang menjana teknologi tinggi.
Perencanaan konspirasi 'The Hidden Hand' ini bergerak dan menyelinap di seluruh dunia tanpa meninggalkan sejengkal tanah pun termasuk ruang seluruh rumah anda apatah lagi kehidupan seharian.
Golongan Hidden Hand ini juga tidak berperikemanusiaan dan sentiasa mengharapkan kehancuran masyarakat dunia khususnya masyarakat Islam.
Jadi siapapun menang sama ada Hillary atau Donald Trump umat Islam terus diganyang di seluruh dunia. Tak perlu diletakkan sebarang harapan kepada mereka untuk membawa kestabilan dunia.
Kegawatan ekonomi dunia, peperangan, kebuluran dan penularan wabak penyakit berbahaya dunia dijangka berterusan. Krisis demi krisis dirancang dan bakal berlaku di segenap penjuru.
"Tke world Government will not permit the establishment of peace' (Thomas R. Mashall, Timbalan Presiden Amerika 1913)
Ringkasnya semua revolusi dan perang ynag berlaku di seluruh dunia 90 peratusnya berpunca dari percaturan ahli-ahli keluarga Rothschild.
Semoga kita semua diberikan perlindungan Allah dan terbuka mata hati untuk dapat membezakan antara yang kebenaran dan penipuan. Hayati surah Al-Khahfi supaya kita selamat daripada huru-hara dicetus Yakjuj dan Makjuj dan Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal.
Tuesday, 11 October 2016
Last Saturday the Saudi Arabian airforce bombed a funeral in Yemen and killed over 200 mourners at the funeral. Another 500 or more were injured, some of them seriously.
In retaliation the Yemenis fired a long range Scud missile to hit a Saudi airbase located at Taif inside Saudi Arabia. Taif is located within the district of Mecca, 108 km away from Mecca city. Please see map:
This is the deepest missile strike into Saudi Arabia.
The Yemenis also fired missiles at two US Navy destroyers at the Bab el Mandeb straits.
Missiles Fired from Rebel-held Yemen Land near US Destroyer.
The Saudi government has been telling their people that the Yemenis have NOT crossed the border into Saudi Arabia and that they are defeating Yemen.
This first Scud missile strike 520 km into Saudi Arabia and hitting Taif has just burst all the hot air in their propaganda.
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Two missiles fired from rebel-held territory in Yemen landed near an American destroyer in the Red Sea, the U.S. Navy said Monday, the second such launch targeting ships in the crucial international waterway in recent days.
The missile launches Sunday came as a ballistic missile fired from Yemen apparently targeted a Saudi air base near the Muslim holy city of Mecca, the deepest strike yet into the kingdom by Shiite rebels and their allies.
The rebels fired another two missiles into the Saudi Jizan region along the border on Monday, wounding two foreigners who worked there, the local civil defense said in a statement.
Yemen's Shiite rebels, known as Houthis, and their allies offered no reason for the launches, though they came after a Saudi-led airstrike targeting a funeral in Yemen's capital killed over 140 people and wounded 525 on Saturday.
In a statement, the Navy said no American sailors were wounded and no damage was caused to the USS Mason, an Arleigh Burke class of guided missile destroyer whose home port is Norfolk, Virginia. Lt. Ian McConnaughey, a spokesman for U.S. Navy Forces Central Command, said that it's unclear if the USS Mason was specifically targeted, though the missiles were fired in its direction over an hour's time, starting at around 7 p.m.
An American defense official said the USS Mason used onboard defensive measures after the first missile was fired, but it wasn't clear if that caused the missile to splash harmlessly into the sea.
The destroyer was north of the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, which serves as a gateway for oil tankers headed to Europe through the Suez Canal, the official said.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss details of the incident that haven't been made public.
The Houthi-controlled SABA news agency of Yemen quoted an anonymous army official denying its forces fired on the USS Mason, without elaborating.
Last week, an Emirati-leased Swift boat came under rocket fire near the same area and sustained serious damage. The United Arab Emirates described the vessel as carrying humanitarian aid and having a crew of civilians, while the Houthis called the boat a warship.
U.S. Navy officials declined to immediately discuss what kind of rockets were used in the USS Mason incident.
Analysts with the Washington Institute for Near East Policy suggested in a report that the Houthis may have targeted the Emirati ship with an Iranian anti-shipping cruise missile, based on purported video of the attack.
Shiite power Iran supports the Houthis, but denies arming them. Any Iranian involvement could exacerbate tensions with the U.S. following a series of tense naval encounters in the Persian Gulf in recent months.
Saudi state television aired a brief clip of what appeared to be a projectile that was said to have landed in Taif, in the ballistic missile attack. The video shows the flash of an explosion, followed by images of emergency vehicles.
Taif is home to Saudi Arabia's King Fahd Air Base, which hosts U.S. military personnel training the kingdom's armed forces.
The Saudi military said the missile fired late Saturday night was intercepted and caused no damage. The U.S. military's Central Command, which oversees troops in the Middle East, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Al-Masirah, a Houthi-run satellite news channel, identified the missile as a local variant of a Soviet-era Scud. It said the Volcano-1 missile targeted the air base.
The Houthis have fired a series of ballistic missiles in Saudi Arabia since a kingdom-led coalition of Arab countries launched an offensive against them in Yemen in March 2015. Most of those ballistic missiles have hit areas far closer to Saudi Arabia's border with Yemen.
In the Taif attack, however, the missile struck a target more than 520 kilometers (325 miles) from the border. Taif also is just outside of Mecca, which is home to the cube-shaped Kaaba that all of the world's Muslims pray toward.
The Saudi military said it earlier intercepted another ballistic missile fired Sunday on the Yemeni city of Marib.
The Houthis gave no reason for their targeting of Taif, but it comes after a Saudi-led airstrike Saturday targeting a funeral in Yemen's capital, Sanaa.
On Sunday, thousands marched through the streets of Sanaa to protest the strike, one of the deadliest single attacks in the impoverished Arab country's relentless civil war.
The Saudi Foreign Ministry said its U.N. mission sent a letter on Sunday to the Security Council, expressing the kingdom's "deep regret of the reported attack" on the funeral. Saudi officials have promised to investigate the bombing.
Yemen's war is largely overshadowed by the conflict against the Islamic State group elsewhere in the Middle East, though rights groups have mounted increased criticism of the Saudi-led airstrikes in recent months for killing civilians. The U.N. and rights groups estimate the conflict has killed at least 9,000 people and displaced nearly 3 million more.
Associated Press writers Maggie Michael in Sanaa, Yemen, Brian Rohan in Cairo, and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.
Tuesday, 4 October 2016
Sebuah helikopter dilaporkan terhempas di atas bumbung sebuah dewan yang masih dalam pembinaan di Sekolah Kebangsaan Balung, Tawau, pagi ini, menyebabkan sekurang-kurangnya 13 anggota tentera dan empat pelajar cedera.
Ketua Polis Daerah Tawau, Asisten Komisioner Fadil Marsus, berkata kejadian berlaku kira-kira jam 9.15 pagi.
Semua mangsa yang cedera dikejarkan ke Hospital Tawau untuk rawatan lanjut.
Helikopter terbabit dipercayai melanggar bucu bumbung bangunan sekolah sebelum terhempas di dewan sekolah terbabit yang dalam pembinaan mengakibatkan struktur berkenaan mengalami kerosakan teruk.
Kejadian berlaku ketika sesi pembelajaran sebelum disusuli dentuman kuat yang mengejutkan warga sekolah berkenaan.
TUDM: Helikopter NURI mendarat cemas
Helikopter terbabit dipercayai melanggar bucu bumbung bangunan sekolah sebelum terhempas di dewan sekolah terbabit yang dalam pembinaan mengakibatkan struktur berkenaan mengalami kerosakan teruk.
Kejadian berlaku ketika sesi pembelajaran sebelum disusuli dentuman kuat yang mengejutkan warga sekolah berkenaan.
TUDM: Helikopter NURI mendarat cemas
Sementara itu, Bahagian Perhubungan Awam TUDM dalam satu kenyataan media berkata helikopter itu membuat pendaratan cemas berhampiran Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Balung Tawau pada jam 9.35 pagi.
Helikopter yang membawa 14 penumpang berlepas pada jam 7.35 pagi membuat latihan penerbangan harian biasa.
“Semua anak kapal dan penumpang helikopter tersebut selamat,” kata kenyataan itu.
Katanya TUDM menghantar pasukan penyelamat ke kawasan insiden dan mengawal kawasan sebelum mengambil tindakan bagi membawa keluar helikopter dari kawasan insiden.
“TUDM akan menubuhkan satu pasukan penyiasatan bagi mengenalpasti punca kejadian,” katanya.
Gambar: Sumber FB/Twitter
Sunday, 2 October 2016
WW3 WARNING Planet closer to catastrophic World War III than at any time for SIXTY years, experts warn… and it doesn’t look good for Britain or America if it does kick off
BY COREY CHARLTON
THE world is closer to a catastrophic and bloody World War III than at any other point in the past 60 years, experts have warned.
Russia and China, both of which are pumping vast amounts of money into their militaries, could soon rival the US in terms of power and prestige.
All three nations want to remain a global superpower – if not the only one – and are preparing for war, it is claimed.
But they oppose each other on a swathe of issues across the globe, creating a delicate political balance that could collapse and engulf nuclear states and alliances such as NATO.
A range of experts have identified several flashpoints across the globe which are today the most likely triggers for such a war.
The proximity of NATO and Russian bombers flying over Syria, Vladimir Putin’s aggression in eastern Europe, and China’s movements in the South China Sea are among them.
Experts have also raised concerns about the instability of nuclear-power Pakistan as extremist factions and terrorist groups within the country grow in power.
Adding to this is these groups’ sworn opposition to neighbouring India – which holds its own much-coveted nuclear arsenal.
Britain’s Admiral Lord West told The Sun Online: “Basically none of us know what is going to happen but we are in a more dangerous, chaotic and unpredictable time than any other in my 50 years in the force.
“I believe that because of Brexit, I think Europe is very flaky, I think it is unfortunate that we didn’t stay in, because they actually need our military expertise.
“I can see bits of Europe breaking up and when Europe gets into a mess, twice in the past we’ve had to go in there and clear it up with immense loss of blood and lives.”
He warned that Britain was not sufficiently investing in its defence – and in particular, its Royal Navy.
The investment required to maintain its strength had not materialised in the years since the Falklands War, he said, leaving Britain in a precarious place.
RUSSIA AND THE BALTIC STATES
In July, a 25-page report by the US-based think tank Atlantic Council warned of Russia’s growing threat to NATO.
NATO has been Europe’s primary military alliance since WWII – all 28 member states have sworn to respond as a group if a single member is attacked.
The council’s report warned that Russia was an “existential threat to the Baltic states and Poland” and an annexation could be implemented “with great speed”.
It continued: “This might come at a time NATO and the EU are distracted by another crisis, or it might relate to some particular high profile event, the outcomes of which Moscow wants to shape.
“It might also result from a misperception of NATO’s activities and a miscalculation of the Alliance’s resolve.”
Admiral Lord West also said: “Russia under Putin is becoming quite aggressive, it’s spending a large amount of money on its military capabilities.
“Putin has said he believes in using tactical nuclear weapons if there is a war. That is highly dangerous.
“There’s little debate that he thinks of the Baltic states and possibly Poland as a Russian sphere of influence. They are NATO countries – I find that extremely dangerous.”
“I think people like Putin understand robust responses, they understand military power. I think he thinks he’ll pick (the Baltic states) off one-by-one.”
CLASHES OVER SYRIA
Another point of simmering tensions is Syria, where US and Russia are both carrying out airstrikes in support of opposing groups.
While they share a common foe in ISIS, the US has backed Kurdish and moderate Syrian rebel groups against President Bashar al-Assad.
Russia, on the other hand, is backing al-Assad against the rebels.
With both countries carrying out air raids across the relatively small area, the chances of accidental clashes and misperceptions is high.
Peter W. Singer, a leading expert on future war, wrote in The Daily Telegraph last year: “As in the past, it is perfectly possible that a third world war could start with a small event, or even by accident.
“One of the many Russian bomber planes now probing NATO’s borders could collide with an RAF Typhoon, prompting an aerial skirmish the likes of which the world has not seen for decades.
“Indeed, the skies over Syria are starting to get dangerously crowded, with Russian jets flying near US planes on bombing runs, and sparring with NATO air defences in neighbouring Turkey.”
Such an incident – albeit on a much smaller scale – was seen in November when Turkey downed a Russian jet it claimed it had encroached on its airspace during raids in Syria.
The incident led to a collapse in diplomatic relations between the two countries and sparked weeks of mudslinging between Ankara and Moscow.
With neither side prepared to lose face, their military posturing only came back from the brink after a Russian soldier was photographed travelling through the Bosphorus Strait brandishing a rocket launcher.
THE SOUTH CHINA SEA
In the past few years China has moved aggressively to dominate the South China Sea with the construction of artificial islands containing fighter jet bunkers.
The move has alarmed countries such as Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines who dispute its territorial claims in the region.
Futhermore, it has aggravated Japan and South Korea – two key members of a Pacific bloc the US has sworn to protect.
Peter W. Singer is also among those to suggest World War III could be triggered when “a Japanese or American ship scrapes paint with its Chinese Navy counterpart amid the reefs in the Pacific that are being militarized as part of Asia’s current arms race”.
Indeed, Chinese military commanders – who are pushing ahead with new submarine deployments into the US’s Pacific sphere – believe this to be a genuine and legitimate scenario.
After a close call last year, China’s naval commander Admiral Wu Shengli warned his US counterpart: “If the United States continues with these kinds of dangerous, provocative acts, there could well be a seriously pressing situation between frontline forces from both sides on the sea and in the air, or even a minor incident that sparks war.”
THE COLLAPSE OF NUCLEAR PAKISTAN
Experts have long feared the collapse of nuclear-armed Pakistan – a country rife with instability, terror groups and with a sworn hatred of neighbour India.
The concern is that its nuclear arsenal could fall into the hands of non-state groups ready to use it against the West, or other proxy groups.
Notably, Pakistan was the birthplace of the Taliban – a fundamentalist Islamic group that spread into Afghanistan and ran the country following its war with the Soviet Union.
A British Ministry of Defence report released in January earmarked the region as one that will continue to generate threats to the UK.
It also warned that “inter-state conflict and internal instability” were possible.
A March report by Harvard Kennedy School stated the “risk of nuclear theft in Pakistan appears to be high”.
The authors wrote: “The trend seems to be toward increasing risk, as Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal expands and shifts toward tactical nuclear weapons, while adversary capabilities remain extremely high.
“Over the longer term, the possibilities of state collapse or extremist takeover cannot be entirely ruled out.”
BE READY FOR WAR': LEADING EXPERT'S DIRE WARNING
George Friendman, the founder of geopolitical forecaster STRATFOR, has warned: “Be ready for war.”
Mr Friedman has written extensively about emerging trends and international affairs.
He recently told Business Insider that interstate war – such as that seen during World War I and II, is a recurring characteristic of politics.
“There has never been a century that has not had a systemic war — a systemic war, meaning when the entire system convulses.
“Do you want to bet this will be the only century that doesn’t have one? I’ll take that bet.
“When you have the countries like Germany, China, and Russia decline, and be replaced by others, that’s when systemic wars start.
“That’s when it gets dangerous, because they haven’t yet reached a balance. So Germany united in 1871 and all hell broke loose.
“Japan rose in the early 20th century, and then you had chaos.
“So we’re looking at a systemic shift. Be ready for war.”